Procurement approvals that build themselves, then wait for your sign-off.

The procurement configuration: your reference data, the product-attribute taxonomy, purchase-approval policy, cost distribution, and the field mappings that align with your ERP.

She builds it in the right order so everything holds together, giving you a governed procurement setup rather than a pile of half-wired records.

No. Purchase orders, invoices, receipts and procurement cases are operational and ERP-synced — they're generated as work happens, not authored during setup.

Phyllis inspects them read-only to ground her plan, then builds only the configuration that governs them: the approval chain, the taxonomy, the reference data and the ERP maps.

Yes. Procurement approvals and taxonomies have real gotchas that trip up hand-built setups, and Phyllis knows them, so what she builds works the first time rather than failing quietly.

Every change is checked against what actually saved, so a dropped detail surfaces before the work is marked done.

No. Phyllis explores, proposes a plan, and waits. Records are only created after you approve.

Everything is staged for review and is reversible, so you can promote or roll it back cleanly.

Every finding is cited to your own live instance — the approval policy, the payment terms, the ERP maps you actually use — rather than assumed from defaults.

She never invents a field or a value, so the plan reflects what you truly have, not a display-name guess.